Climate Science URL Climate Science URL

Bringing statistics to storylines: rare event sampling for sudden, transient extreme events

Finkel, Justin, and Paul A. O’Gorman

Justin Finkel, Paul A. O'Gorman

A leading goal for climate science and weather risk management is to accurately model both the physics and statistics of extreme events. These two goals are fundamentally at odds: the higher a computational model's resolution, the more expensive are the ensembles needed to capture accurate statistics in the tail of the distribution. Here, we focus on events that are localized in space and time, such as heavy precipitation events, which can start suddenly and decay rapidly. We advance a method for sampling such events more efficiently than straightforward climate model simulation. Our method combines elements of two recent approaches: adaptive multilevel splitting (AMS), a rare event algorithm that generates rigorous statistics at reduced cost, but that does not work well for sudden, transient extreme events; and "ensemble boosting" which generates physically plausible storylines of these events but not their statistics. We modify AMS by splitting trajectories well in advance of the event's onset following the approach of ensemble boosting, and this is shown to be critical for amplifying and diversifying simulated events in tests with the Lorenz-96 model. Early splitting requires a rejection step that reduces efficiency, but nevertheless we demonstrate improved sampling of extreme local events by a factor of order 10 relative to direct sampling in Lorenz-96. Our work makes progress on the challenge posed by fast dynamical timescales for rare event sampling, and it draws connections with existing methods in reliability engineering which, we believe, can be further exploited for weather risk assessment.

Finkel, Justin, and Paul A. O’Gorman. “Bringing Statistics to Storylines: Rare Event Sampling for Sudden, Transient Extreme Events.” arXiv, February 2, 2024. https://doi-org.ezproxy.canberra.edu.au/10.48550/arXiv.2402.01823.

Read More
Climate Science URL Climate Science URL

Climate Change Contributions to Increasing Compound Flooding Risk in New York City

Ali Sarhadi , Raphaël Rousseau-Rizzi , Kyle Mandli , Jeffrey Neal , Michael P. Wiper , Monika Feldmann , and Kerry Emanuel

Ali Sarhadi , Raphaël Rousseau-Rizzi , Kyle Mandli , Jeffrey Neal , Michael P. Wiper , Monika Feldmann , and Kerry Emanuel

Efforts to meaningfully quantify the changes in coastal compound surge- and rainfall-driven flooding hazard associated with tropical cyclones (TCs) and extratropical cyclones (ETCs) in a warming climate have increased in recent years. Despite substantial progress, however, obtaining actionable details such as the spatially and temporally varying distribution and proximal causes of changing flooding hazard in cities remains a persistent challenge. Here, for the first time, physics-based hydrodynamic flood models driven by rainfall and storm surge simultaneously are used to estimate the magnitude and frequency of compound flooding events. We apply this to the particular case of New York City. We find that sea level rise (SLR) alone will increase the TC and ETC compound flooding hazard more significantly than changes in storm climatology as the climate warms. We also project that the probability of destructive Sandy-like compound flooding will increase by up to 5 times by the end of the century. Our results have strong implications for climate change adaptation in coastal communities.

Sarhadi, Ali, Raphaël Rousseau-Rizzi, Kyle Mandli, Jeffrey Neal, Michael P. Wiper, Monika Feldmann, and Kerry Emanuel. "Climate change contributions to increasing compound flooding risk in New York City." Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 105, no. 2 (2024): E337-E356. DOI: https://doi-org.ezproxy.canberra.edu.au/10.1175/BAMS-D-23-0177.1

Read More

Electric-gas infrastructure planning for deep decarbonization of energy systems

Rahman Khorramfar , Saurabh Amin

Rahman Khorramfar, Dharik Mallapragada, Saurabh Amin

The transition to a deeply decarbonized energy system requires coordinated planning of infrastructure investments and operations serving multiple end-uses while considering technology and policy-enabled interactions across sectors. Electricity and natural gas (NG), which are vital vectors of today’s energy system, are likely to be coupled in different ways in the future, resulting from increasing electrification, adoption of variable renewable energy (VRE) generation in the power sector and policy factors such as cross-sectoral emissions trading. This paper develops a least-cost investment and operations model for joint planning of electricity and NG infrastructures that considers a wide range of available and emerging technology options across the two vectors, including carbon capture and storage (CCS) equipped power generation, low-carbon drop-in fuels (LCDF) as well as long-duration energy storage (LDES). The model incorporates the main operational constraints of both systems and allows each system to operate under different temporal resolutions consistent with their typical scheduling timescales. We apply our modeling framework to evaluate power-NG system outcomes for the U.S. New England region under different technology, decarbonization goals, and demand scenarios. Under a global emissions constraint, ranging between 80%–95% emissions reduction compared to 1990 levels, the least-cost solution relies significantly on using the available emissions budget to serve non-power NG demand, with power sector using only 14%–23% of the emissions budget. Increasing electrification of heating in the buildings sector results in greater reliance on wind and NG-fired plants with CCS and results in similar or slightly lower total system costs as compared to the business-as-usual demand scenario with lower electrification of end-uses. Interestingly, although electrification reduces non-power NG demand, it leads to up to 24% increase in overall NG consumption (both power and non-power) compared to the business-as-usual scenarios, resulting from the increased role for CCS in the power sector. The availability of low-cost LDES systems reduces the extent of coupling of electricity and NG systems by significantly reducing fuel (both NG and LCDF) consumption in the power system compared to scenarios without LDES, while also reducing total systems costs by up to 4.6% for the evaluated set of scenarios.

Khorramfar, Rahman & Mallapragada, Dharik & Amin, Saurabh, 2024. "Electric-gas infrastructure planning for deep decarbonization of energy systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 354(PA). https://doi-org.ezproxy.canberra.edu.au/10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.122176.

Read More